Continuing
the series of articles on the subject, are agents of arms dealers the
real culprits for the glitches in our defence procurement? Contrary to
many analysts, I hold the view the legitimate agents provide a valuable
interface to understand the needs of the user and identify the right
sources for procurement. They should be paid a legitimate commission
like any other agents in the commercial world. As they are legitimate,
transaction will be above board and accountable. They will be paying
income and service taxes and their accounts will be open for inspection
at any time. This will bring transparency in the transaction.
In
1986, Government of India removed agents as the middle men and decided
to directly deal with arms manufacturers. The species of honest
middlemen was kept out and under the table wheeler-dealers tookover. And
immediately thereafter the Bofors scam hit the national headlines.
There seem to be no stopping of scams.
I
am reproducing an article, courtesy DNA India, "Confessions of a former
arms dealer" written by a former naval officer in support of my
argument. The article shows how a legitimate agent can provide valuable
service to the armed forces. When we reform the system (WHEN? is the 64
dollar question), this aspect should also be paid attention.
Confessions of a former arms dealer
Benoy Bhushan, April 4, 2012