Friday, December 2, 2011

Sri Lanka Perspectives: November 2011

By Col  R Hariharan

INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS

Internally, the month of November 2011 saw a politically turbulent period and the country’s economy was facing the heat from the international economic downturn. 

Acquiring of private enterprises

The hurried enactment of the bill “The Revival of Underperforming Enterprises and Underutilized Assets Bill” to take over 37 private enterprises, which the government said were not performing well, created strong reaction from most of the business houses and political parties. The bill had drawn widespread criticism from business, political circles and even Buddhist clergy. Even two partners of the ruling coalition the right wing Jatiya Hela Urumaiah (JHU) and the National Freedom Front (NFF) abstained from voting although the bill was passed with 122 votes in favour and 46 against. 

The opposition United National Party (UNP) called the Act as targeted against the UNP as 33 of the 37 affected companies belonged to Sevanagala Sugar Industries Ltd., owned by Daya Gamage, UNP organiser for Amparai, an important source of financial support for the party. Their suspicion was further reinforced when the government announced the 35,000 across of unused plantation land acquired would be redistributed to poor families for development. In the parliament also the bill generated a lot of heat.

The international rating agency Fitch Rating commenting on the enactment said, "There is a risk that it will set a precedent for further expropriation and will be applied to a broader range of businesses and assets; this would be a disincentive for both local and foreign investors." The chamber of commerce expressed similar concerns. As though to underline their fears, such precipitate action without detailed discussion would discourage foreign investments. As though to underline this concern, media reports indicate Sri Lanka's Board of Investment, the state investment promotion agency, has deleted a page which 'guaranteed' investors freedom from expropriation, raising questions of heightened political risk, lawmakers said.

Former army chief Fonseka’s second conviction

Sri Lanka’s opposition parties have rallied against the  supreme court’s conviction of former Sri Lanka army chief Sarath Fonseka to three years imprisonment after finding him guilty of “propagating a false rumour” in violation of emergency regulations and the Criminal Procedure Code in “the White Flag case” as an act of vindictiveness. The case relates to Fonseka’s interview given to an English daily The Sunday Leader soon after the war. In the interview he had alleged that the Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa ordered the killing of LTTE cadres wanting to surrender with white flags. Fonseka pleaded not guilty claiming he was quoted out of context in the article. The opposition United National Party (UNP) has taken up the issue on the floor of Parliament also; public protests have also been organised.

Already the former General is serving a jail term of 30 months awarded by an army court martial for engaging in politics while in active military service. Opposition parties had put him up as their common candidate against President Rajapaksa in the last presidential poll. And they consider the cases have been foisted on Fonseka out of vindictiveness for contesting against Rajapaksa. According to Sri Lanka media, the U.S. is reported to have warned the Government that the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) in Geneva would be moved against Sri Lanka unless Fonseka is released from prison. The U.S. also considers him a political prisoner.

Political confrontation

The confrontation between the ruling United Peoples Freedom Alliance coalition and opposition parties, particularly the UNP, has become sharp as the latter is smarting under the government’s efforts to crush the opposition while ignoring the misdeeds of its own constituents. The enactment to acquire the 37 private enterprises and the second conviction of Fonseka have provided rallying point for the opposition as they have generated fear and discontent among sections of the public. 

The UPFA’s lack of sensitivity in handling these issues in the parliament resulted in fisticuffs between members in the House during the budget presentation. The UNP’s Deputy Leader Karu Jayasuriya accused the ruling coalition members of attacking UNP MPs in the presence of President Mahinda Rajapaksa in parliament. In the follow up action, the The Parliament yesterday suspended Deputy Petroleum Industries Minister, Sarana Gunawardena for a week for throwing a bottle of water at UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe during what media described as “a mini-battle” in parliament. The confrontation is likely to continue as both sides appear to be in no mood to cool their passions and come to operate within the norms of parliamentary democracy. Of course much of the responsibility for this state of affairs lies with the UPFA and the government.

Economy

The Budget for the year 2012 presented by the President in Parliament on November 21 has been structured in response to the gloomy global economic scene. The salient aspects of the budget include, devaluation of the Sri Lanka rupee (SLRs) by 3 percent from current level of SLRs 110.40 per US $. It anticipated a fall in gross domestic product to 6.2 percent from this year’s 7 percent. The government hopes to bridge the gap by achieving 14.7 percent increase in total revenue over this year’s figure.

The total expenditure growth has been pegged at 21.2 percent growth marginally less by 0.2 percent than this year’s growth. To attract investments a tax holiday of 6 to 12 years is being proposed to be offered for investments ranging from SLRs 300 million to 2.5 billion.  A total of SLRs 190.3 billion is proposed to be spent on urban development and improvement of roads while SLRs 35.8 billion will be spent on irrigation.  A 10 percent hike in public sector wages is also proposed.

However, it is doubtful whether these measures would be able to insulate the export-dependent economy from the effects of economic slump in Europe and the U.S.and its global fall out. 

Miscellaneous

The government has informed the parliament that 893 persons had been detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). Of them 64 were currently on trial, and in the case 259 others cases have not been filed pending instructions from Attorney General’s office. Ten detainees under PTA have been released.

Mrs Chandrika Kumaratunga, former President, has strongly criticised the government for the way it has handled the internally displaced persons in the Eelam-war affected areas. She was critical of entrusting the reconstruction work to the army, which had kept 450,000 people confined in camps for two years. She cited her own experience in handling the situation with greater sensitivity after Jaffna was captured during her tenure. She also accused the army of grabbing large chunks of land. 

EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS

Belying the government expectations, Sri Lanka lost its bid to host 2018 Commonwealth Games to Australia’s Gold Coast by 43 votes to 27.  It was expected to promote Hambantota and its new port and infrastructure facilities. At the back of the decision could be the efforts of non-Asian members of the Commonwealth many of who are unhappy with Sri Lanka’s lack of response to international concerns over its human rights record and alleged war crimes. 

President Rajapaksa met the Indian Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh on the sidelines of the 18th SAARC summit at Addu. The perennial topics of discussion – rehabilitation of war displaced Tamils, construction of houses gifted by India and inevitably, the Tamil Nadu fishermen’s issue (of violence by Sri Lankans) - came up in the discussion at their meeting. The fishermen’s issue has been an increasing cause of concern as Tamil Nadu chief minister Ms Jayalalithaa is increasing the hype over the issue much to the discomfort of the Congress party and the DMK. This issue is likely to stoke more passions inTamil Nadu the coming months as the state government already has Centre under fire over number of other contentious issues including the Kudankulam nuclear reactor and decision to introduce foreign direct investment in retail business.

An evaluation report of Norway’s peace effort in Sri Lanka from 1997 to 2009 commissioned by the Norwegian government last year released during the month created a lot of local interest. The report prepared jointly by experts from the Christian Michelsen Institute (CMI), Bergen, and the School of Oriental and African studies (SOAS), London, made a critical analysis of both the positive and negative results of Norwegian facilitation. However, it stated “The Sri Lankan peace process is largely a story of failure in terms of bringing an end to the civil war” although Norway could not be held responsible for this ultimate failure. The Norwegian report has kindled the report of the Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) which was also submitted in mid November 2011. However, the government has not yet made the report public.
Written on November 30, 2011
Courtesy: South Asia Security Trends, Vol 5 No 11, December 2011
URL: www.security-risks.com




No comments: